Arga M. Nugraha

Garden-variety certified IT audit & control guy, CMU alum, tinkerer of Web 2.0 development, a technology hyper-enthusiast, an avid RSS feed reader, a self-professed geek/nerd/dweeb, a proud father of an out-of-this-world kid and a thankful husband of an extraordinary wife - and apparently has a weakness for superlatives.

Posts

October 17, 08:23 PM

Sejak kantor gw pindah ke Jakarta Selatan dari kawasan Semanggi, gw akhirnya jadi salah satu penumpang setia TransJakarta koridor 8. Selama setahun lebih ini, ada banyak hal yang menurut gw bikin TransJakarta nggak bisa dibandingkan sama sarana transportasi umum kelas dunia. Here are the reasons why.

Jumlah bus terlalu sedikit. Pernah coba pulang kantor naik TransJakarta pas rush hours? Konsekuensinya cuma dua, nunggu lama di halte atau bisa masuk bus tapi penuhnya nggak ketulungan. Rasa frustasi yang ada semakin diperparah dengan tidak pastinya jadwal kedatangan bus dan perilaku manusia Jakarta yang nggak pernah paham konsep antri (but, then again, this is probably fueled by the previous facts). Herannya, setiap kali BLU TransJakarta buka koridor baru, tradisi pinjam-meminjam bus antar koridor nggak pernah bisa dihilangkan.

Ini udah begini sejak 2009.

BLU TransJakarta nggak kenal sebuah ide radikal: pemeliharaan. Coba liat berapa banyak halte yang pintunya nggak jalan, lantainya berlubang. Lalu coba lihat berapa banyak bus yang AC-nya nggak beres, pintunya rusak, atau papan dan PA system notifikasi halte yang nggak berfungsi. Semuanya dibiarkan bertahun-tahun tanpa ada upaya perbaikan atau paling nggak langkah-langkah pengamanan untuk penumpangnya. Nyawa emang dianggap murah di sini ya? Gw pernah kesandung dan nyaris jatuh pas turun dari bus karena pintu shelter yang gw pikir udah kebuka ternyata masih ketutup tapi kacanya pecah.

Tidak ada konsistensi. Pernah liat peta jalur TransJakarta? Pernah coba bandingkan sama keadaan sebenarnya? Rute Pluit-Pinang Ranti punya akhir perjalanan yang berbeda tergantung jenis busnya, bus gandeng hanya sampai Grogol, sedangkan yang tunggal sampai Pluit. Rute Pondok Indah Harmoni punya trayek berbeda tergantung harinya, saat akhir pekan lewat Tomang, saat lainnya lewat Roxy. Pernah memperhatikan di mana bus-bus itu berhenti? Kadang di pintu terdekat dengan loket, kadang di pintu terjauh. Nggak terhitung gw harus lari-lari cuma karena gw nunggu di pintu yang salah. Herannya nggak ada sekelumit pemberitahuan pun kepada penumpang kecuali penumpang nanya. Lha kalo penumpangnya nggak tau kalo harus nanya gimana?

Fasilitas untuk orang difabel (people with different abilities) cuma omong kosong. Ramp di jembatan penyeberangan itu ceritanya kan buat mereka yang difabel kan? Pernah merhatiin nggak kalo ujung-ujungnya apa bener bisa dilalui sama misalnya orang berkursi roda? Di sepanjang koridor 1 aja gw tau ada beberapa halte yang ujung ramp-nya terlalu curam untuk kursi roda atau malah dikasih tangga. Lha? Ini niat nggak sih nolongin orang? Lalu di busnya juga nggak ada tempat untuk orang berkursi roda. Yang gw baru liat di bus-bus koridor 9 aja yang ada tempatnya.

Kualitas pengemudi mayoritas cuma lebih baik satu strip ketimbang angkutan umum biasa. Nggak terhitung berapa kali jalan gw (sebagai pengemudi mobil) dipotong sama bus TransJakarta di lampu merah, padahal jelas-jelas lampu buat mereka menyala merah. Gw sebagai penumpang juga udah bosen liat mereka seenaknya makan jalan orang lain di lampu merah walaupun belum jadi haknya. Frustasi karena waktu tempuh lama memang bisa dimengerti karena lajur khusus mereka banyak disabot pengemudi goblog, tapi apa itu jadi pembenaran untuk ikutan goblog?

Niat sterilisasi lajur busway nggak sungguh-sungguh. Bosen banget sama yang satu ini. Apa gunanya dibikin jalur khusus kalo emang orang yang nyabot dibiarin aja? Jadinya cuma jadi perangkap polisi busuk aja. Dulu pernah ada ide contra-flow itu kok nggak jadi diimplementasikan setelah diuji coba kenapa ya? Ada yang tau alasannya? Padahal itu menurut gw sakti banget untuk sterilisasi lho. Ampuh, motor mobil nggak bakal ada yang berani deh.

Kok sepertinya nggak ada pengukuran metriks apapun untuk mengukur keberhasilannya ya? Gw nggak tau apa ini udah berjalan otomatis di belakang layar atau gimana. Setau gw, untuk transportasi publik itu ukurannya adalah waktu tunggu di halte, waktu pindah antar rute, tingkat okupansi bus, dan semacamnya. Gw kayanya nggak pernah liat ada yang ngukur beginian deh seumur-umur. Ataupun kalau ada, palingan cuma survey jangka pendek. Padahal ya kalau ini diotomatisasi, datanya bisa dianalisa kan? Faedahnya ada banyak lho. Pertama, bisa dianalisa kelemahan-kelemahan jalur busway-nya. Misalnya, jam segini di titik ini macet parah, jadi perlu ditambah frekuensi busnya. Faedah lainnya adalah data tadi bisa dikembalikan ke publik kan? Jadi mereka bisa memutuskan hal-hal seperti kalau mau sampai di lokasi A jam segini, saya mesti ada di halte busway B jam segini. Itu fitur normal lho di negara maju. Nggak ada yang hebat di situ.

Kalo hal-hal di atas bisa ditangani, paling nggak gw yakin ada banyak pengendara mobil pribadi yang mau beralih ke transportasi umum. Nyupir itu capek dan nggak murah lho, tapi buat sebagian besar orang, itu masih mending ketimbang berjejal di bus yang nggak pasti datangnya karena jalurnya nggak steril dan mengancam jiwa karena nggak ada pemeliharaan fasilitas. Jadi ketimbang cuma menghukum pengendara pribadi dengan kemacetan dan ancaman naiknya harga bensin dan tarif parkir, kenapa nggak diber insentif untuk pindah dengan transportasi umum massal yang nyaman dan manusiawi? Takut rugi? Mayoritas perusahaan transportasi publik memang merugi kok, tapi semuanya kan untuk the greater good toh?


Filed under: This Just Popped In! Tagged: bus, busway, Jakarta, kritik, lalu lintas, TransJakarta, transportasi, transportasi publik, transportasi umum
March 04, 04:56 PM

… is that this exhilarating experience I’m having here, stateside, with all the opportunities, the exuberance, the out-of-the-box thinking, and even the mere peacefulness of its law and order; will alter my perceptions of my real life back home so much that I’ll never look at it ever again without having a condescending view of it all. Dear God, please lead me to the path of gratefulness and humility, and not to the opposite. Amen.

[To dear readers, this post is not meant as the way I view my peers & colleagues, this is more about the way I perceive my life and, to a certain extent, my nation & my country as a whole.]


Filed under: This Just Popped In! Tagged: concerns, lessons of life, life, thoughts, wishes
March 04, 04:41 PM

Being a graduate student here in the U.S., I found that the hardest part of doing the homeworks, essays, and papers are not the assignments themselves. In fact, for me, the hardest part is almost always finding the resources I need to support my homeworks. Although you can find abundant information in the web, sometimes the fact that you’re a foreigner in a foreign country can distract you from the most obvious sources of information. Here are some of the resources I found which have been proven helpful when I need to support my ideas and thoughts with relevant data.

  1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Part of U.S. Department of Labor, this organization and the cornucopia of data and statistics it provides helped me a lot for my more business-oriented courses. Here you can find various U.S. data and some international data too for comparison about inflation, labor costs, compensation, benefits, etc.
  2. FedStats. This website acts as an aggregator of various statistics offered by various U.S. governmental agencies. If you couldn’t figure out which agency has that piece of information you need, head here first.
  3. National Center for Healthcare Statistics. Surprisingly, this branch of Center Disease Control – yes, that organization which deals with contagious viruses and bio-weapons – has a trove of health-related statistics. I once pulled fertility numbers from the site to back-up one of my tasks’ basic premise.
  4. Your university library. Yes, they also offer help that you can use. For example, the CMU Library subscribes to various academic journals and business materials (reports, market insights, etc.). These types of materials usually costs companies thousands of dollars, so you know how their quality are like. They also offer research guides for particular topics which will aim you to the right direction for your particular search subject.. So, try to talk with your librarian first.
  5. Online Timer. I use this site to prepare myself for the presentations. I even use it as a timer when I do presentations. What I do usually is to prop someone else’s laptop open, open the URL on a browser and then just have it as a giant timer in front of me. Works great so that you needn’t take a glance at your watch every so often.
  6. Creative Commons Search. Whether you agree or not, a picture is still worth a thousand words. At least, putting relevant pictures into your papers or presentation will make it pretty and convincing. Usually, we turn to Google Images for this purpose right? Unfortunately, combing through Google Images brings about a serious drawback in the academic world: license and copyright issues. So, if you want to make sure you’re in the clear about these issues, do a Creative Commons search instead. This way, you’ll ensure that all your images (and other multimedia content for that matter) will at least leave you a certain degree of latitude about what you do with it.
  7. Purdue Online Writing Lab – Research and Citation Resources. Never get yourself tangled in the web of plagiarism. I could not emphasize more on the importance of citation in the western academic world. Always paraphrase and cite properly. The writing lab offers an excellent guide on how to cite properly in your papers and assignments, including the popular APA standard.

That’s it. I hope this helps.


Filed under: Excerpts from the Real World Tagged: academia, academic, education, essay, homeworks, papers, resources
January 25, 02:05 PM

Photo by krossbow

I’m now on day 175th here in the U.S. This being my first time long-term experience living abroad, I made a lot of, let’s just say, missteps along the way. If I had the chance to start over, here are a few pointers that I’d like to know prior to going here.

A.Clothing & Attire

  1. If the place where you’re going is cold (i.e. Eastern U.S., Europe), ditch the wool/knitted gloves. They won’t cut it with the temperatures. For anything below 15°C, you should go with insulated gloves.
  2. When buying winter coats, look for something with a neutral color. You have some latitude if you’re a woman, but as a general rule of thumb, save the bright colored ones for the slopes. You don’t want people looking at you strangely because you’re wearing that neon blue jacket on the bus. Trust me, this happened to me. Try black, dark blue, grey, or something along those lines. You might also consider those wool formal/semi-formal pea-coats or trench-coats which will go more nicely with your formal attire.

B. Shopping

  1. Buy your winter clothes stateside. This will save you a lot of lugging around and you’ll definitely get the latest models. The price difference is not to big of a deal, and you’ll definitely get newer models. Try to buy the clothes before the winter actually starts to kick in in order to get better prices, or better yet, buy the winter clothes in the Spring to really save some money.
  2. Buy your clothing at thrift or discount stores. Try DSW for shoes, Marshalls or T.J. Maxx for clothes, and Burlington Coat Factory for everything else. You should avoid retailers like Macy’s or J.C. Penney. If you want to splurge a bit, you can try AmericanEagle Outfitters.
  3. Be on the lookout for discounts and coupons. Believe it or not, discount coupons are a big thing in the U.S. I regularly check sites like Groupon or Woot’s Community Deals to monitor for those. I also check DODTracker once in a while, although I most warn you that the deals on that site are not to good. Often they try to sell cheap knockoffs or Chinese made products. Nonetheless, I got nice Oakley sunglasses through that site. My other favorite site is RetailMeNot, which also offers discount coupons for retailers online and offline.

B. Transportation

  1. If you just need a car occasionally, consider joining Zipcar or similar car-sharing services. This way, you can avoid the hassle of looking for a car, transferring the title, paying insurance, car maintenance, and eventually selling the car again. Of course, I live in a bigger city, so the service is available and the cars quite ubiquitous.
  2. Before reporting that Zipcar damage, you may want to purchase the additional insurance waiver. You’ll regret not doing so, buy it while you still can. They have a policy that you have to wait a whole accident-free year before you can buy the waiver after you report an incident.
  3. Install GoogleMaps on your phone. This is quintessential. Printing a map is so 90s. With GoogleMap on your phone, you’ll easily browse your way around and even figure out the public transportation required to go to your destination.

C. Apartment

  1. Find an apartment with central heating. It’s the best method to distribute heat evenly throughout the place. If you can secure an apartment with all utilities included (sewage, trash, water, gas), it’ll be even better.
  2. Not all Internet services are available. The service which you can use depends on the building management. For example, my apartment’s neighbourhood is serviced by Verizon’s FiOS, but they couldn’t hook it up to my apartment because for an apartment building with more than a certain number of units Verizon requires an on-premise equipment, which they can only do with the building management’s permission. I was practically stuck with Comcast service (higher price, lower bandwidth, dang) because of this.
  3. Try to leverage your student status to get discounts with the cable company. I got a discount of  USD 50 from the monthly subscription when I mention that I’m a student at CMU.

D. Household Appliances

  1. Find these on Craigslist first. Instead of buying new, you can get them cheaper used. I got a microwave oven for USD 20 (instead of USD 60 at Walmart), a toddler high-chair for USD 15 (delivered to my front door, no less), a bike complete with helmet and accesories for USD 80 (instead of USD 150+ new).
  2. You can also try garage sales. Usually with the hordes of freshmen coming, these will come abound.
  3. If you do buy new, keep all the boxes for selling later. You eventually have to sell, right? Keeping the boxes will help a lot. You can also get out on a limb and save the details page of the things you buy to make it easier for you when you advertise it on Craigslist.

E. Communication

  1. If you don’t need the data plan, go for the prepaid services. They will save you quite a sum of money. Oh, and mention that you’re a student when you apply for the services. Sometimes they will waive the application fee that way.
  2. To call home use Skype (obviously). Skype’s new beta version even offers multi-party videoconference. You can try ooVoo if you want an alternative.
  3. To really call home you can use international calling cards. I used GlobalMind fro eCallChina. For USD 20 you can get like 400 minutes calling to a landline or about 200 minutes to a cellphone. The call quality is not bad, aside from the occasional 1 second delay and failed call. They also have local phone numbers in most U.S. cities you can also save the local call needed to use the service. As an alternative, you can use Skype’s paid offering.
  4. If you really want to skimp on local calling, you can use GoogleVoice from your computer. It’s free until the end of 2011.

F. Financial

  1. Open an account at a bank which has a partnership with your school. Most often than not you’ll get benefits such as free tuition transfer fee, discounts at merchants, and other free perks. I opened an account at PNC because they’re ubiquitous in Pittsburgh, offer a free checking account. Another benefit is that they allow one free incoming wire transfer per month (saving me USD 8, if I’m not mistaken, per transfer). Their online banking system also rocks!
  2. To save on monthly administration fee, you and your spouse can opt to open a joint account. They will give you a separate card and separate online banking user IDs for both of you at no extra cost.
  3. Don’t bother applying for credit card. First of all you’ll need a social security number and it takes years to build your credit profile. If they approve your application, the limit on your card will likely be on the lower hundreds of dollars. You couldn’t do much with it. Besides, all Visa or Mastercard debit cards can be used just fine with online and offline merchants.

G. Other

  1. Try to get a social security number if you can. It’ll make your life much easier. You can get phones for cheap (albeit with the whole or 2-year contract), get discount cards at retailers, and other perks. Too bad today they require written job offer letters before they will issue one.
  2. Tipping. Tipping is a rather hard skill to master. There’s a lot of different arguments about this one. However, as a rule of thumb these apply.
    1. 15%-25% tips is expected at restaurants & services. Leaving less means that you had an unpleasant service and sometime the waiter will confront you about this.
    2. No tipping is expected in places where you have to get your goods yourself (self-service) e.g. fast-food chains, supermarkets, & if you get your goods to go.

Filed under: Excerpts from the Real World, Travelling on the Company's Dime Tagged: living abroad, tips, u.s.a., united states
January 17, 12:59 PM

Needed some place to document lessons learned from doing the prolonged task 7 in my program, Web Services. Where best other than my own humble blog?

  • How to configure servlet debugging on Tomcat with Eclipse.
  • Get an SVN server running for your group. It’ll save you a lot of headaches.
  • Do use SVN plugins with your IDE (Integrated Development Environment) instead of using a separate IDE & SVN client. The latter is just to much hairy, overhead, and headaches.
  • Subclipse (SVN Plugin for Eclipse) update/installation end-point. You should use this URL in Eclipse’s add plugin dialog in order to install it.
  • JavaHL Wiki. If you hit an error running Subclipse and the error is something about missing JavaHL class, you should download the package from this site.
  • Photo by Sawyer Pangborn

    How to use Subclipse (SVN Plugin for Eclipse).

  • List of eBay Sandbox’ unsupported features. You’ll save yourself from a lot of banging your head against the wall if you read this at the start of development.
  • Strive to commit only working code.
  • You may want to use a uniform IDE across all of your team members. It’ll save you a lot of effort trying to make the project’s build structure uniform for different IDEs.
  • Save your project frequently. Somehow Eclipse is so unstable. Every so often, my team members have to delete their Eclipse project and do a whole project checkout again from the SVN server. Damn you, Eclipse!
  • If you can, try to configure Eclipse to use your real, physical Tomcat instance & installation folders instead of having it set up its own Tomcat environment. I’ll show you how in another blog post, hopefully.
  • If in doubt, clean, build, and publish your project. That’s the best way to keep your sanity. Again, Eclipse & Tomcat combination is soo unstable.
http://agile.csc.ncsu.edu/SEMaterials/tutorials/subclipse/

Filed under: Excerpts from the Real World Tagged: development, Eclipse, Eclipse IDE, howto, Java, lessons learned, MSIT eBiz Tech, programming, Subclipse, Subversion, SVN, Task7, tips, Tomcat
January 12, 05:47 PM

Photo by canvas blank

I’m in the middle of  a project for my graduate degree which involves creating a helper app for eBay sellers to list their items on eBay through its Trading API. I’m writing it in Java so I’m using their Java SDK. The version I’m currently using is version 687, their latest one. I’ve been bitching and moaning about a lot of things in their API & Java SDK documentation, but the one thing that finally pushed me over the edge and made me write this angry rant is eBay’s inconsistency in observing its own business rules inside the SDK.

Take the class of ShippingServiceDetailsType as an example. It has the method isValidForSellingFlow() which tells us that “If true, the shipping service can be used in the AddItem family of calls. If false, the shipping service is not currently supported when creating or modifying listings.” The problem is that it seems that the programmers forgot that a boolean value is a binary condition and added a third option of null. Just beautiful. When I retrieve US eBay Site’s possible values for the ShippingServiceDetailsType class through GeteBayDetailsResponseType class’ getShippingServiceDetails() method, all I’m getting for the 68 returned objects’ isValidForSellingFlow() method is either null or true.

At this point, one would assume that the nulls should just be treated as falses, right? Wrong! By doing just that, I created lists of ShippingServiceDetailsType for domestic and international shipping without the ones with null values, effectively excluding three possible ShippingServiceDetailsType for freight shipping (they’re the only ones available for freight shipping, mind you). The lists would then be fed into my add item JSP, rendering my user unable to select freight shipping for his/her item. Even when I have another selection for setting ShippingTypeCodeType to ShippingTypeCodeType.FREIGHT_FLAT (as it’s clearly documented here, to select freight shipping), the API returned this lousy “SEVERE: com.ebay.sdk.ApiException: At least one valid shipping service must be specified.” error when I tried to list the item.

This is just one example. Don’t get me started on my story about how two different classes have the same method (and supposed to return the same object) but don’t, or how the Javadoc for the SDK are mainly just unexplained collections of attributes and methods. You’d be surprised at the number of hairs I’ve lost over these darned inconsistencies. And the project is not even due yet.


Filed under: This Just Popped In! Tagged: development, ebay, eBay API, eBay Trading API, inconsistencies, inconsistent, Java, programming, rant, SDK, stupid, Trading API
September 02, 12:01 AM

After pulling a significant amount of hair for what has been like two longest days of my life, I finally was able to install Windows XP Mode on my newly upgraded Windows 7 Professional. At first, I was stumped at the second step of installing three required packages as described by Microsoft on their Windows XP Mode download page.

Windows6.1-KB958559-x64.msu update package installation was a success. There was a screen telling me that I need to reboot, so that was what I did. After the desktop disappear, Windows 7 still showed that it’s still “configuring windows updates” before shutting down. After the shut down, it went on again, telling me that it still needed more time “configuring windows updates”. The progress percentage goes up and up until approximately 96% or 97%. Afterward, it just said, “Failure configuring Windows updates. Reverting changes.” WTF?! It went on to full revert the update package, rebooted itself and only then was able to enter the usual logon screen. You can see the video here.

After googling high and low for a solution, I’ve found several good resources, including this one – you should probably check it as it may work for you. Unfortunately it still didn’t help me. After some more tinkering with my system, this is what I did.

  1. I uninstalled my Symantec End Point Protection software.
  2. I uninstalled my Oracle VirtualBox software.

Amazingly, after those two, the update package was installing fine. No more reverting back after a certain percentage!


Filed under: Excerpts from the Real World Tagged: emulation, Microsoft, operating system, virtualization, VirtualPC, windows, Windows 7, Windows XP Mode
August 31, 05:10 PM

Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Tomat, singkatan yang digunakan oleh keluarga saya – atau mungkin yang ini udah umum juga sih – untuk menunjuk pada tabiat “sekarang tobat, besok-besok kumat”. Dan tidak, saya tidak merujuk pada tabiat tomat yang arahnya ke dalam, introspeksi, meningkatkan kualitas takwa dan kebaikan dalam diri kita. Hanya saja, saya benci dengan mereka yang memproyeksikan tabiat “tomat” mereka kepada orang lain.

Perlu contoh? Saya benci sekali dengan model himbauan tempat hiburan tutup selama bulan Ramadhan. Buat saya, dan saya yakin akan ada lebih banyak orang yang berpendapat sama dengan saya, puasa itu sifatnya personal. Yang perlu tau kita puasa hanya kita sendiri dan Allah SWT. Apa hubungannya sama orang lain yang nggak puasa? Apa hak saya nyuruh-nyuruh orang lain yang tidak puasa – entah karena memang Islam bukan imannya atau yang iman Islamnya belum kuat – untuk nutup warungnya hanya karena saya puasa dengan dalih “menghormati orang puasa”?

Orang puasa tidak perlu dihormati. Puasa atau tidak, itu pilihan pribadi – terlepas bahwa apabila seseorang itu Muslim, maka dia wajib puasa. Ingatlah bahwa salah satu manfaat puasa bahwa kita merasakan menjadi orang terhina, merasakan derita kaum papa yang tidak seberuntung kita, bisa menikmati makan minum bahkan lebih dari tiga kali kalau kita ingin. Intinya, puasa itu wajib, menghormati orang puasa itu paling banter cuma sunah.

Kembali ke contoh kasus nyuruh orang tutup warung selama Ramadhan. Manfaatnya apa buat kaum Muslim? Supaya mereka tidak tergoda? Lha, godaan itu selalu ada kok, mau bulan Ramadhan apa nggak. Justru selama Ramadhan kita diganjar Allah SWT dengan pahala lebih besar apabila bisa menahan godaan, bukan? Kalo tempat hiburan ditutup, apa lantas semua Muslim puasa? Apa Muslim yang belum kuat imannya nggak bisa cari tempat hiburan lain, yang mungkin malah lebih haram karena sekarang tempat-tempat yang resmi disuruh tiarap? Saya malah kepikiran mudaratnya: banyak pekerja di tempat semacam itu – terlepas halal/haramnya ya – yang kehilangan penghasilan selama satu bulan. Apa selama sebulan itu anak-anak mereka diminta dengan hormat ikutan puasa demi “menghormati orang puasa”? Ambil contoh lain kasus saya sekarang, yang sedang berpuasa di negeri “orang kafir” – untuk meminjam istilah mereka yang di wilayah garis keras. Apa saya bisa – dan punya hak – untuk nyuruh orang kafir sekitar 270 juta untuk nggak puasa demi saya?

Alasan kedua saya adalah this clearly sends the wrong signal to non-Moslems. Kira-kira, sinyal yang sampai ke benak mereka kurang lebih adalah, “Oh, orang Islam itu ibadah cuma kalau puasa. Kalo puasa, mesjid penuh, tempat hiburan ditutup, semua wanita pake jilbab. Sesudah 1 atau 2 Syawal, ya kembali seperti biasa.” Ini belum lagi kalau mereka denger tindak tanduk kaum norak berjubah putih anarkis yang suka ngerusak itu, lagi-lagi justru di bulan puasa yang seharusnya umat Muslim diminta untuk menahan nafsu.

Jadi, menurut saya tinggalkanlah tabiat “tomat” ini. Munafik itu buat saya termasuk bohong, dan bohong juga mengurangi pahala puasa, kan?


Filed under: This Just Popped In! Tagged: agama, islam, muslim, tomat
June 16, 06:49 AM

Setelah visa pelajar (F-1) ada di tangan Senin dua minggu yang lalu, akhirnya hari ini gw balik lagi ke Kedubes A.S. untuk ngurus visa untuk dependents (F-2). Ini langkah-langkah yang gw lakuin hari ini tadi.

  1. Datang pagi. Appointment gw dan istri jam 7.30 WIB, tapi tetep aja gw dateng jam 06.10. Dari pengalaman terakhir dateng ke Kedubes, pintu depan tetep dibuka jam 7.00, jadi seharusnya datang pagi malah jadi sesuai dengan waktu appointment. Dari awal, mindset - dan susunan dokumen-dokumen – harus sudah diatur bahwa gw dateng mewakili anak gw, yang masih di bawah 14 tahun, dan istri untuk dirinya sendiri. BTW, kalau biasa makan pagi, sarapan dulu biar tenang. Siapa tau antrinya lama.
  2. Antrian pertama di bawah rel kereta. Gw langsung turun dari taksi di bawah jembatan layang rel kereta api. Udah ada sekitar 15-20 orang yang ngantri. Antriannya tertib dan dijaga dua orang local security guard yang juga menjaga jalur masuk mobil ke Kedubesnya. Untung gw bawa kertas koran benda lainnya buat alas duduk sehingga nggak terlalu pegel berdiri di trotoar. Jam 07.00 WIB antrian dipersilahkan bergerak ke antrian berikutnya setelah diminta untuk mematikan handphone. BTW, di sebelah kiri antrian ada pos keamanan (entah pos polisi atau pos local security guard), di belakangnya sepertinya ada kamar kecil yang bisa digunakan apabila perlu.
  3. Antrian kedua di depan Kedubes. Di sini kita ngantri lagi, kira-kira 10 meter sebelum pintu utama Kedubes. Nggak lama sih di sini. Sekitar 3 menit, sesudah itu kita diminta bergerak ke depan pintu utama per sekitar 10 orang.
  4. Periksa dokumen awal dan isi tas. Di sini kita ngantri lagi sebentar untuk dicek tas kita, diperiksa dokumennya dan ditanya keperluannya. Setelah semuanya OK, baru kita dibukakan pintu untuk masuk ke pelataran depan Kedubes. Di sini, taktik utama supaya kedua orang tua boleh masuk adalah dokumen dipegang sendiri-sendiri. Istri gw bawa dokumennya sendiri, dan gw bawa punya anak gw. Gw nggak pernah sebutkan bahwa kami sekeluarga.
  5. Antrian ketiga di depan loket pemeriksaan dokumen. Di sini, antrian dilayani oleh dua loket pemeriksaan dokumen dan satu loket kasir. Yang perlu dipersiapkan di sini adalah paspor terakhir dan yang lama (kalau ada); satu lembar foto 5×5 sesuai ketentuan; dokumen I-20/DS-2019 asli yang sudah ditandatangani pencari visa; bukti bayar visa application fee (apabila sudah bayar; struk putih dari Bank Permata atau receipt hijau/merah yang bertapak validasi komputer dari Standard Chartered Bank); dan satu lembar konfirmasi pengisian data DS-160 secara on-line. Yang perlu diperhatikan adalah kualitas barcode yang ada di lembar konfirmasi DS-160 itu. Usahakan print dengan laser printer, karena kalau tidak terbaca oleh barcode scanner mereka, otomatis akan dipulangkan dengan slip biru. Hal lain yang sering bikin pencari visa dipulangkan adalah foto dan bukti pembayaran visa application fee (yang per 4 Juni 2010 udah naik jadi USD 140). Apabila dipulangkan karena masalah foto, disarankan untuk membuat pas foto di studio-studio foto yang ada di Jalan Sabang. O ya, di loket pemeriksaan dokumen ini, aplikasi online kita diperiksa lagi untuk ditambahkan apabila ada yang kurang. Biasanya ini seputar data orang tua, nomor KTP dan sekolah SMP pencari visa. Biar cepet, sebaiknya semua field yang ada di aplikasi online diisi aja deh. BTW, di sini gw urus dokumen istri dan anak secara sekaligus (jadi satu), jadi gw doang aja yang menghadap ke loket dengan istri gw di samping gw. Setelah semua dokumen dinyatakan lengkap, kita akan diberikan kartu antrian, dan seluruh dokumen yang kita serahkan tadi akan dikembalikan setelah distaples jadi satu (termasuk paspor). Selanjutnya kita diminta ke kasir.
  6. Loket kasir. Sebenernya kita juga bisa bayar visa application fee di kasir Kedubes ini, nggak perlu di bank. Tapi di kasir ini hanya terima mata uang IDR. Gw waktu itu udah bayar duluan di StandChart, sehingga pas di loket kasir ini cuma diminta bukti pembayaran dan dokumen terstaples tadi dan kekurangan uang (karena per tanggal 4 Juni 2010, fee-nya naik jadi USD 140 dari yang sebelumnya USD 131 pas gw bayar). Gw cuma diminta bayar IDR 90.000, berarti hanya tambah selisih USD 9 dikali kurs mereka saat itu (IDR 10.000). Di sini gw jg urus dokumen istri dan anak secara sekaligus (jadi satu), jadi gw doang aja yang menghadap ke loket dengan istri gw di samping gw.
  7. Antrian keempat di depan metal detector dan x-ray machine. Berikutnya ngantri lagi di depan pintu ruangan kecil metal detector dan x-ray machine. Di sini masuknya per kelompok, sesuai dengan nomor grup di kartu antrian yang tadi diberikan di loket pemeriksaan dokumen. Setelah masuk, kita berhadapan dengan local security guard dan diminta menunjukkan appointment confirmation untuk dicatat di buku register mereka. Setelah itu semua benda elektronik diminta (termasuk handphone, MP3 player, kamera digital maupun analog, USB flash disk, internet banking token, dan remote alarm mobil) untuk disimpan. Kita akan diberikan nomor penitipan dan satu badge untuk pengunjung yang harus dipakai. Setelah itu, semua tas, gesper, dan – apabila perlu – sepatu diminta untuk dilewatkan ke x-ray machine dan kita sendiri diminta melewati metal detector gate. Setelah semua dinyatakan lolos, kita masuk ke ruangan selanjutnya. BTW, di sini, gw dan istri daftar sendiri-sendiri lagi.
  8. Antrian kelima di ruang tunggu besar. Di sini ada banyak bangku panjang untuk menunggu, ada kios-kios penjual makanan dan minuman dari Ranch Market, dan juga kamar kecil untuk mereka yang perlu. Melalui pengeras suara, kita juga akan dipanggil berdasarkan grup untuk masuk ke ruangan interview. Gw di sini ternyata nggak lama, langsung disuruh masuk ke ruang tunggu dalam.
  9. Antrian keenam di ruang tunggu dalam untuk scan sidik jari. Setelah masuk ke ruangan, kita menunggu sejenak untuk diambil sidik jarinya di jajaran loket yang di sebelah kiri, sesuai panggilan petugas. Petugas yang di belakang loket semuanya adalah bule, tapi sepertinya mereka bisa bahasa Indonesia patah-patah dan kadang dibantu oleh local staff. Yang diminta pertama adalah empat jari tangan kiri (kecuali jempol), kemudian jari yang sama untuk tangan sebelah kanan, dan terakhir kedua jempol sekaligus. Setelah itu kita diminta menunggu di kursi yang ada. Di sini yang di-scan sidik jarinya hanya istri gw. Gw cuma menghadap ke local staff dan bilang kalo anak gw di bawah umur. Kartu urutan kelompok gw terus diminta dan gw dipersilahkan duduk kembali.
  10. Antrian ketujuh di ruang tunggu dalam untuk wawancara. Ruangan ini sama dengan yang sebelumnya. Di sini perlu pasang telinga benar-benar karena ruangannya agak ramai dan panggilannya biasanya hanya sekali. Petugasnya tampak nggak seneng setiap ada orang yang tanya ke mereka dan ternyata tadi sudah dipanggil, jadi harus perhatikan baik-baik.
  11. Wawancara. Setelah grup kita dipanggil, kita harus berbaris ke belakang di loket yang ditentukan. Ada lima loket yang masing-masing dilayani oleh satu orang bule, yang tampaknya juga mengerti bahasa Indonesia walau patah-patah. Gw maju ke depan sama istri barengan dan somehow si pewawancara sudah tau kalau kami sekeluarga, sepertinya melihat dari data yang di-entry secara online itu. Pertanyaan-pertanyaannya enteng aja, dan si bule pewawancara sedikit mau nge-joke tapi we didn’t get it because we thought it was part of the interview question. Hahahaha. Anyway, pertanyaannya sebenernya lebih diarahkan ke gw, seperti: yang bayar kantor bukan, kantornya apa, berapa lama ikatan dinas, mau ke universitas apa di U.S., di kota apa, ambil jurusan apa, dan berapa lama programnya. Yang diajukan ke istri gw cuma, “Are you ready to live in Pittsburgh?” yang dijawab simpel sama istri gw, “Yes.” Si bule selanjutnya minta lihat paspor gw yang udah ada visa F-1-nya, lalu minta surat financial guarantee dari kantor. That’s it. Sambil tanya-tanya itu, si bule gw liat udah nyobek kartu putih pengambilan itu, gw dah seneng tuh. Mungkin si bule ngeliat itu terus dia kayanya ngerjain gw dengan ngulur-ngulur waktu gitu tiap abis nanya ama gw dia matiin mikroponnya dia terus sok ngomong sama ada bule juga – well, african american sih – di belakangnya. Gombal. Hehehe. Akhirnya dia cuma bilang, “All right, you can have your passport on the 18th. Good luck with your studies.Alhamdulillahirabbil alamin.
  12. Keluar dari Kedubes. Keluarnya hampir sama seperti waktu masuk. Di bawah kaca pertama ada lubang di dinding, di sana kita masukkan visitor’s badge yang tadi. Selanjutnya lewat di pintu besi berputar dan di jendela berikutnya baru kita ambil barang-barang kita dengan tukar nomor penitipan yang tadi. Cek lagi jangan sampai salah barang atau tertinggal. Selanjutnya keluar lewat pintu utama Kedubes yang tadi kita lewati.
  13. Pengambilan visa. Yang ini belum dijalani, jadi nanti di-update lagi ya. Dua hari sesudah wawancara, sesuai dengan jadwal yang ditulis di kartu pengambilan, gw nongol lagi ke Kedubes. Dateng persis jam 14.30, ternyata antrian udah panjang tuh di depan pintu utama. Pengantri disuruh maju sepuluh-sepuluh ke meja pemeriksaan di depan pintu itu. Gw cuma diminta nunjukin kartu pengambilan untuk diliat tanggalnya dan isi tas gw diperiksa – kali ini gw sudah lebih bijak untuk tidak bawa laptop ke sana. Sesudah masuk pintu utama, ternyata antrian di dalam juga udah panjang. Antrian ini dilayani oleh tiga loket (dua loket pemeriksaan dokumen yang kemarin dan loket kasir yang difungsikan juga untuk mengembalikan visa. Sesudah gw terima paspor, gw langsung cek dan dang! Ternyata di baris bagian bawah visa anak & istri gw ada nama principal, dan di situ nama gw salah ditulis! Gombal. Padahal udah ada I-20 di situ kan, kok ya nggak dicek dulu. Akhirnya gw komplen ke loket tempat gw ambil dan disuruh tunggu dulu untuk dicek. Abis itu gw dipanggil lagi dan akhirnya dikasih kartu pengambilan lagi untuk ambil dua hari kerja berikutnya. Weleh. Dan itu semua nggak ada sepotong pun kata maaf dari semua petugasnya. Coba bayangin kalo gw harus segera berangkat, apa nggak rusak semua rencana? Moral of the story: kasih spare waktu untuk kasus-kasus model begini dan rasanya lebih baik ambil visa sendiri, jangan minta tolong orang supaya kalau ada salah segera bisa di-komplen.
  14. Pengambilan visa kedua. Setelah dua hari kerja berikutnya, gw datang lagi persis 14.30 WIB di Kedubes. Antrian lagi-lagi sudah panjang dan proses antrian sama seperti waktu datang untuk mengambil visa yang sebelumnya. Hari ini ada yang berbeda, masing-masing loket selain difungsikan untuk mengambil non-immigrant visa, juga punya fungsi berbeda. Untuk pengambilan visa pelaut dilayani di loket paling kanan (loket dua) sedangkan untuk pengambilan visa immigrant (green card) dan untuk paspor Amerika dilayani di loket paling kiri (loket kasir). Saat mengantri sudah diumumkan bahwa nama pemegang paspor harus ditulis di kartu pengambilan supaya memudahkan pencarian paspor. Setelah gw serahin kartu pengambilan gw, kedua paspor dependents gw dibalikin. Sempet ada insiden kecil, si mbak ngaku cuma terima satu kartu, padahal gw dah kasih dua (lesson learned: saat ngasih lebih dari satu kartu, ada baiknya tunjukkan ke petugasnya dan konfirmasi, “Saya ambil dua ya, Mbak”, biar nggak kisruh). Nggak apa sih, kartu gw akhirnya ketemu – ketlisut di paspor orang lain – dan si mbak minta maaf. Sesudah itu tidak lupa gw cek dengan seksama visanya serta dokumen I-20 yang di-staples ke paspor (dan tidak boleh dilepas, kata si mbak). Setelah yakin semua beres dan cocok, pulang deh. Gw keluar dari Kedubes sekitar 15.05 WIB.

Good luck, Guys! Oh iya, mungkin baca beberapa tips yang ada di bagian bawah post yang ini mungkin membantu juga.


Filed under: Excerpts from the Real World Tagged: american visa, Amerika Serikat, dependent visa, F-2, master's degree, u.s. visa, u.s.a., visa, visa pelajar
June 09, 04:14 AM

Photo by Situs Resmi Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Dengan maksud supaya yang lain bisa belajar dari kesalahan-kesalahan dan kebenaran-kebenaran yang gw lakukan beberapa waktu yang lalu ngurus visa pelajar (F-1) di Kedutaan Besar Amerika Serikat di Jakarta, berikut ini adalah langkah-langkah yang gw jalanin kemarin.

  1. Datang pagi. Gw dateng hari Senin (hari tanpa appointment khusus untuk pencari visa F-1) jam 06.45-an. Kedubes resminya buka jam 07.30 WIB, tapi hari itu gw juga mengantisipasi membludaknya antrian pencari visa pelajar karena hari itu hari pertama berlakunya sistem no appointment untuk pencar visa pelajar. BTW, kalau biasa makan pagi, sarapan dulu biar tenang. Siapa tau antrinya lama.
  2. Antrian pertama di bawah rel kereta. langsung turun dari taksi di bawah jembatan layang rel kereta api. Ternyata udah ada sekitar 10-15 orang yang ngantri lebih awal. Antriannya tertib dan dijaga dua orang local security guard yang juga menjaga jalur masuk mobil ke Kedubesnya. Saran gw, bawa kertas koran benda lainnya buat alas duduk di trotoar. Jam 06.15 WIB antrian dipersilahkan bergerak ke antrian berikutnya setelah dicocokkan antara foto pada paspor dengan wajah pengantri. BTW, di  sebelah kiri antrian ada pos keamanan (entah pos polisi atau pos local security guard), di belakangnya sepertinya ada kamar kecil yang bisa digunakan apabila perlu.
  3. Antrian kedua di depan Kedubes. Di sini kita ngantri lagi, kira-kira 10 meter sebelum pintu utama Kedubes. Nggak lama sih di sini. Sekitar 3 menit, enam orang pertama sudah diminta bergerak ke depan pintu utama.
  4. Periksa dokumen awal dan isi tas. Di sini kita ngantri lagi sebentar untuk dicek tas kita, diperiksa dokumennya dan ditanya keperluannya. Setelah semuanya OK, baru kita dibukakan pintu untuk masuk ke pelataran depan Kedubes.
  5. Antrian ketiga di depan loket pemeriksaan dokumen. Di sini, antrian dilayani oleh dua loket pemeriksaan dokumen dan satu loket kasir. Yang perlu dipersiapkan di sini adalah paspor terakhir dan yang lama (kalau ada); satu lembar foto 5×5 sesuai ketentuan; dokumen I-20/DS-2019 asli yang sudah ditandatangani pencari visa; bukti bayar SEVIS fee; bukti bayar  visa application fee (apabila sudah bayar; struk putih dari Bank Permata atau receipt hijau/merah yang bertapak validasi komputer dari Standard Chartered Bank); dan satu lembar konfirmasi pengisian data DS-160 secara on-line. Yang perlu diperhatikan adalah kualitas barcode yang ada di lembar konfirmasi DS-160 itu. Usahakan print dengan laser printer, karena kalau tidak terbaca oleh barcode scanner mereka, otomatis akan dipulangkan dengan slip biru. Hal lain yang sering bikin pencari visa dipulangkan adalah foto dan bukti pembayaran visa application fee (yang per 4 Juni 2010 udah naik jadi USD 140). Apabila dipulangkan karena masalah foto, disarankan untuk membuat pas foto di studio-studio foto yang ada di Jalan Sabang. O ya, di loket pemeriksaan dokumen ini, aplikasi online kita diperiksa lagi untuk ditambahkan apabila ada yang kurang. Biasanya ini seputar data orang tua, nomor KTP dan sekolah SMP pencari visa. Biar cepet, sebaiknya semua field yang ada di aplikasi online diisi aja deh.
  6. Kekurangan dokumen dan diberikan slip biru untuk kembali esok hari. Bukti pembayaran itulah yang bikin gw harus balik besoknya. Dokumen biru ini menyebutkan nama kita, nomor pasport serta dokumen yang kurang. Dokumen biru ini sakti, kita nggak perlu bikin appointment untuk bisa masuk ke Kedubes. Paling tinggal antri aja.
  7. Datang pagi (lagi). Hari berikutnya hari Selasa. Gw dateng pagi lagi, 5.45 WIB.
  8. Antrian pertama di bawah rel kereta. Antriannya ternyata lebih pendek dari hari sebelumnya, rasanya karena hari ini khusus untuk mereka yang sudah bikin appointment dan yang kemarin dokumennya ada yang kurang. Hari ini, antrian dibikin prioritas. Yang pertama adalah para pelaut, pencari visa bisnis, dan terakhir baru untuk pencar visa pelajar. Jam 07.10 WIB, antrian diperbolehkan bergerak ke antrian berikutnya.
  9. Antrian kedua di depan Kedubes. Di sini gw kaget, ternyata di depan sudah ada antrian orang-orang yang nggak ikut ngantri di bawah rel kereta. Ternyata ada 75 orang peserta pertukaran pelajar IFS. Weks. Mungkin karena sudah ada kerjasama dengan Kedubes,  sehingga mereka nggak perlu antri di bawah rel kereta. Gombal. There goes my chance of swift visa service.
  10. Periksa dokumen awal dan isi tas. Sama seperti yang di atas.
  11. Antrian ketiga di depan loket pemeriksaan dokumen. Ini juga sama seperti yang di atas. Untuk yang kaya gw, yang udah pegang slip biru dari hari sebelumnya, tinggal diminta lagi semua dokumennya plus slip biru itu. Setelah semua dokumen dinyatakan lengkap, kita akan diberikan kartu antrian, dan seluruh dokumen yang kita serahkan tadi akan dikembalikan setelah distaples jadi satu (termasuk paspor). Selanjutnya kita diminta ke kasir.
  12. Loket kasir. Sebenernya kita juga bisa bayar visa application fee di kasir Kedubes ini, nggak perlu di bank. Tapi di kasir ini hanya terima mata uang IDR. Gw waktu itu udah bayar duluan di StandChart, sehingga pas di loket kasir ini cuma diminta bukti pembayaran dan dokumen terstaples tadi dan kekurangan uang (karena per tanggal 4 Juni 2010, fee-nya naik jadi USD 140 dari yang sebelumnya USD 131 pas gw bayar). Gw cuma diminta bayar IDR 90.000, berarti kurs kekurangannya tetep pakai kurs saat gw bayar hanya tambah selisih USD 9 dikali kurs mereka saat itu (IDR 10.000).
  13. Antrian keempat di depan metal detector dan x-ray machine. Berikutnya ngantri lagi di depan pintu ruangan kecil metal detector dan x-ray machine. Di sini masuknya per kelompok, sesuai dengan nomor grup di kartu antrian yang tadi diberikan di loket pemeriksaan dokumen. Setelah masuk, kita berhadapan dengan local security guard dan diminta menunjukkan kartu identitas berfoto untuk dicatat di buku register mereka. Setelah itu semua benda elektronik diminta (termasuk handphone, MP3 player, kamera digital maupun analog, USB flash disk, internet banking token, dan remote alarm mobil) untuk disimpan. Kita akan diberikan nomor penitipan dan satu badge untuk pengunjung yang harus dipakai. Setelah itu, semua tas, gesper, dan – apabila perlu – sepatu diminta untuk dilewatkan ke x-ray machine dan kita sendiri diminta melewati metal detector gate. Setelah semua dinyatakan lolos, kita masuk ke ruangan selanjutnya.
  14. Antrian kelima di ruang tunggu besar. Di sini ada banyak bangku panjang untuk menunggu, ada kios-kios penjual makanan dan minuman dari Ranch Market, dan juga kamar kecil untuk mereka yang perlu. Melalui pengeras suara, kita juga akan dipanggil berdasarkan grup untuk masuk ke ruangan interview.
  15. Antrian keenam di ruang tunggu dalam untuk scan sidik jari. Setelah masuk ke ruangan, kita menunggu sejenak untuk diambil sidik jarinya di jajaran loket yang di sebelah kiri, sesuai panggilan petugas. Petugas yang di belakang loket semuanya adalah bule, tapi sepertinya mereka bisa bahasa Indonesia patah-patah dan kadang dibantu oleh local staff. Yang diminta pertama adalah empat jari tangan kiri (kecuali jempol), kemudian jari yang sama untuk tangan sebelah kanan, dan terakhir kedua jempol sekaligus. Setelah itu kita diminta menunggu di kursi yang ada.
  16. Antrian ketujuh di ruang tunggu dalam untuk wawancara. Ruangan ini sama dengan yang sebelumnya. Di sini perlu pasang telinga benar-benar karena ruangannya agak ramai dan panggilannya biasanya hanya sekali. Petugasnya tampak nggak seneng setiap ada orang yang tanya ke mereka dan ternyata tadi sudah dipanggil, jadi harus perhatikan baik-baik.
  17. Wawancara. Setelah grup kita dipanggil, kita harus berbaris ke belakang di loket yang ditentukan. Ada lima loket yang masing-masing dilayani oleh satu orang bule, yang tampaknya juga mengerti bahasa Indonesia walau patah-patah. Gaya masing-masing pewawancara beda, ada yang talkative ada yang tidak, tapi intinya sama aja sih untuk pertanyaan-pertanyaannya. Karena gw penerima beasiswa S2 dari kantor, gw cuma ditanyain mau kuliah apa (S1, S2, atau lainnya); di universitas mana di U.S.; jurusan apa; dulu kuliah S1 di mana; yang bayar kuliah siapa; perusahaannya apa; ada ikatan dinas nggak; kalo ada berapa tahun; dan sudah berapa tahun kerja di kantor. Selain itu diminta juga dokumen financial guarantee dari kantor gw sama surat keterangan kerja dari kantor. Abis itu pewawancaranya ketik-ketik sesuatu di komputernya, dan kemudian gw dikasih kartu kecil warna putih yang isinya tanggal ambil paspor karena gw dinyatakan dapet visanya. Alhamdulillah.
  18. Keluar dari Kedubes. Keluarnya hampir sama seperti waktu masuk. Di bawah kaca pertama ada lubang di dinding, di sana kita masukkan visitor’s badge yang tadi. Selanjutnya lewat di pintu besi berputar dan di jendela berikutnya baru kita ambil barang-barang kita dengan tukar nomor penitipan yang tadi. Cek lagi jangan sampai salah barang atau tertinggal. Selanjutnya keluar lewat pintu utama Kedubes yang tadi kita lewati.
  19. Photo by josephlee1001

    Pengambilan visa. Yang ini belum dijalani, jadi nanti di-update lagi ya. Seminggu sesudahnya (biasanya kabarnya dua hari kamudian, mungkin ini karena sedang masa peak season jumlah pemohon), saya kembali lagi ke Kedubes A.S untuk mengambil visa. Di kartu pengambilan tertulis 14.30 WIB sampai dengan 15.15 WIB, tapi sepertinya pengambil visa sudah bisa masuk langsung melalui pintu gerbang utama sejak sebelum itu deh. Soalnya gw sampe pintu depan sekitar jam 14.40 dan pas gw masuk udah papasan dengan banyak orang yang keluar dengan bawa-bawa paspor. Kita cukup antri di pintu gerbang utama, diminta menunjukkan kartu pengambilan, pemeriksaan tas (gw bawa laptop, malah jadi agak ribet; saran: gak usah bawa barang elektronik kalo mau bebas ribet), dan baru boleh masuk. Antrian pengambilan adanya di kedua loket pemeriksaan dokumen yang sebelumnya. Di sana serahkan kartu pengambilan, kita ditanyai nama di paspor, dan akhirnya paspor bisa dibawa pulang dengan visa berupa stiker tertempel di salah satu lembarnya. Oh, BTW, pengambilan visa & paspor ini bisa diwakilkan kok, nggak perlu surat kuasa/KTP segala macem. Yang penting tau nama lengkap yang ada di paspor ini. Gw liat banyak bapak-bapak tipe kurir gitu yang ngambil dua/tiga/lebih paspor.

That’s it. Good luck, ya!

TIPS

Berikut adalah beberapa tips dari saya yang mungkin berguna untuk mengurus visa di Kedubes Amerika Serikat.

  • Kalau ada pertanyaan soal pengurusan visa, lebih baik tanyakan ke staf lokal di Kedubes daripada ke local security guard. Bukan apa, jawaban yang diberikan terkesan asal dan cenderung tidak seragam antara satu petugas dengan yang lainnya.
  • Ini mungkin cuma asumsi gw, tapi sepertinya first impression saat wawancara still counts deh. Jadi, penampilan jangan overdressed ataupun juga underdressed. Gw dah liat ada mas-mas yang dateng dengan setelah lengkap keluar dari loket wawancara bawa-bawa slip merah soale. Biasa aja, bebas, rapi, dan sopan.
  • Kalo yang ini asumsi temen gw: seharusnya kerasa kok kalo kita dah mau ditolak. Dia udah liat sendiri di depan dia ada beberapa pemohon visa yang dicecar pertanyaan dengan kesan “mengejar”. Si pemohon kemudian jadi terbata-bata, nggak bisa jawab, dan akhirnya slip merah yang keluar. Rasanya kuncinya adalah tetap tenang dan tunjukkan bukti-bukti dokumen pendukung yang kuat, lengkap, dan asli (jangan fotokopian).
  • Soal dokumen pendukung, semuanya harus tunjukkan yang asli, jangan yang fotokopian. Kemudian kalau ada dokumen asli yang memang kita perlukan, tanyakan atau pastikan bahwa kita bisa minta lagi.
  • Untuk yang kebetulan mengurus visa untuk turis/wisata, harus tau detil rencana perjalanannya: nama biro perjalanan, kapan berangkat, lama perjalanan, maskapai penerbangan, lokasi tujuan wisata ke mana saja, mau ngapain saja di sana. Gw dah liat ada Ibu-ibu yang nggak dapet slip putih (nggak tau sih ditolak atau disuruh balik lagi dengan informasi lebih lanjut) gara-gara nggak bisa jawab saat ditanya itu.
  • Nggak banyak gunanya sok akrab sama si pewawancara. Cukup jawab yang ditanya aja.
  • Dokumen-dokumen pendukung sebaiknya dipegang aja, jangan keliatan sama si pewawancara. Hal ini untuk menghindari pertanyaan lebih lanjut yang sebenernya nggak perlu.
  • Beda dengan apa yang dibilang di website-nya, ternyata boleh kok masuk ke Kedubes dengan bawa tas (bahkan gw pake ransel) dan handphone. Tapi handphone memang harus dimatikan sejak di bawah rel kereta dan harus dititipkan sih. Selain itu boleh juga bawa makanan & minuman ke dalam Kedubes, tapi sepertinya – dilihat dari absennya tong sampah – cuma boleh dikonsumsi di ruang tunggu besar yang ada sesudah pemeriksaan metal detector dan x-ray.
  • Baca informasi pengurusan visa di website Kedubes baik-baik.
  • Ini juga asumsi, tapi sepertinya selalu ada beberapa orang yang diberikan slip kuning secara random. Jadi, jangan terlalu kuatir.
  • Ini juga asumsi gw, tapi sepertinya kalau visa F-1 sudah di tangan, visa F-2-nya umumnya juga lolos.
  • Yang jadi patokan lolos tidaknya foto visa adalah yang kita bawa (pasfoto fisik), bukan yang di-upload saat mengisi form DS-160 secara online itu. Beda antara keduanya juga nggak masalah ternyata.
  • Bule-bule pewawancara bisa bahasa Indonesia kok ternyata, jadi nggak perlu terlalu kuatir soal bahasa. Kalo nggak pede dengan bahasa Inggris, bisa pake bahasa Indonesia, daripada salah jawab. Tapi kalo Anda mengurus visa F-1, ya kebangetan lah kalo masih harus pake bahasa Indonesia. Hehehehe.
  • Menurut kebijakan local security guard, anak di bawah umur 14 hanya bisa diwakili oleh salah satu orangtuanya saja.
  • Untuk yang bawa kendaraan, nggak disediakan lahan parkir di manapun. Rasanya yang paling dekat adalah parkir di Stasiun Gambir atau parkiran Tugu Monas.
  • Kalau musim hujan atau prakiraan cuaca bilang mau hujan, jangan lupa bawa payung. Pas nunggu di luar Kedubes nggak ada atap apapun.
  • Kalau ada kekurangan dokumen apapun dan disuruh kembali, jangan lupa minta slip biru. Hal ini supaya kita bisa balik lagi hari itu juga atau besoknya tanpa perlu bikin appointment lagi.
  • Banyak yang bilang kalo udah pernah dapet visa ke negara non-ASEAN (atau yang tidak memberikan visa on-arrival ke WNI), biasanya lebih mudah disetujui visanya. Makanya bawa paspor lama.
  • Overheard nih ya. Untuk surat dukungan keuangan secara personal untuk biaya sekolah, bunyinya kira-kira harus “Bapak X memiliki uang untuk membiayai Nona Y untuk sekolah”, jangan “Bapak X mau membiayai Nona Y untuk sekolah”.
  • Ini yang maha penting dan harus bener: pasfoto fisik (yang dibawa) dan barcode di DS-160 confirmation.

Filed under: Excerpts from the Real World Tagged: american visa, Amerika, Amerika Serikat, DS-160, DS-2019, F-1, F-1 visa, F1 visa, I-20, Jakarta, Kedubes, student visa, tips, U.S., U.S. student visa, u.s. visa, u.s.a., visa F-1, visa pelajar

Posts

November 02, 06:44 PM

I visited my little brother, a dedicated minimalist, last month. In general, I think of myself as not particularly consumerist-y. But hanging out with somebody who is sooo much better at not consuming pointlessly has left me with a lot to think about.

Gadgets are one of the biggest things I've been pondering. This is not, especially, my area of weakness when it comes to consumerism. (That would be landscaping plants, furniture, and kitchenware.) But I did recently get my first smart phone. I have been, lately, complaining about the weight of my old MacBook. And I have been contemplating a new MP3 player. In other words, I'm at a potential buying stage in my slow-moving gadget cycle. Do I need to be, though? And if there is a reason to buy some new stuff, how should I make those choices?

That's probably why Thomas Hayden's essay In Praise of Crap Technology struck a chord with me. In it, Hayden waxes poetic about his $19.99 Coby MP3 player. It's a product that's supposed to suck. It's something you buy reluctantly, when you can't afford an iPod. But, apparently, nobody bothered to let the Coby know about that. It's boring. It's ugly. It doesn't have the latest features. But, as Hayden points out, it's also durable, inexpensive, inherently theft-deterrent, and reliable. It also does exactly what he needs it to do. No less. And no more.

My portable audio technology needs are simple. A few hundred well-chosen—by me, dammit—songs and a half-dozen episodes of the WTF podcast and I’m good to go. My trusty Coby does all that, with an FM radio tuner included. (I do wish it had AM too—the crap technology of the air—but why gripe?) Most important, it’s worth next to nothing so I’m virtually assured never to lose it—unlike apparently every iPhone prototype ever—and I don’t cringe at all when my toddler flings it across the room. And because the next Coby is sure to be just as mediocre, I’ll never need to upgrade—I’ve stepped off the escalators of feature creep and planned obsolescence, and all the expense and toxic e-waste that come with them. Crap technology, it turns out, is green technology.

Now that's a damn good point. Granted, crap technology can be dirty if it's actually crap—something you're going to have to throw out and replace every year. But it's nice to get this reminder that there's a lot of room between crap-that's-actually-crap and the-newest-most-expensive-thing. That grey zone is home to Hayden's Coby.

It's also home to the Sansa Clip my husband and I have shared for half a decade. It's now outlasted two iPods—one that was lost/stolen and another with a faulty battery. Where those more-coveted gadgets failed, the Sansa came through. And it's stuff like this that brings up an important question I need to ask myself more often: What makes "crap" crap?

I've been pretty proud of my ability to resist the constant-upgrade/early-adopter treadmill. But maybe I need to be less smug about that. Because, until I really thought about how good the Sansa Clip has been to me, I was thinking about replacing it with an iPod. And there's not really a point to that. Because I already own good technology. It's just a piece of good technology that happens to be "crap".



October 31, 09:00 PM
In 1804 we were one billion humans in this planet. Now we are seven billion. How the hell did we grew so much is so little time? This video by National Public Radio has the answer. [NPR] More »


October 31, 04:25 PM

Air Space

Jacob Appelbaum

The sunset on the flight from Reykjavík to Seattle is among air travel's most beautiful sights. Though Keflavík Airport is covered with clouds and rain, the people's spirits there are usually jovial.

The Iceland Air lounge has helpful staff—the welcome desk offers helpful tips on avoiding airport hassles and even provides free internet access. They'll help you read your boarding pass and even answer questions about all its confusing symbols. Should one ever be in the unfortunate position of having the dreaded 'SSSS' marked upon it, the help desk will suggest you wait until the exact boarding time before even approaching customs. They'll even apologize, as if they had any hand in the process.

And that was their recommendation to me, when I had it clearly printed on mine. It was not my lucky day.

I took the lounge employee's advice and left precisely when she suggested. My ticket was purchased by the Swedish government, which invited me to Stockholm to speak at its event on the internet and democratic change. It was upsetting that Sweden's government flew me over, and then the U.S. government—my government—used the Icelandic government to harass me on the way back. I have previously filed DHS requests for redress. Even after it promised to leave me alone, I am still subject to systemic harassment.

Outside of the lounge, the exit customs checkpoint is split into two parts. The first is an occasionally long and winding line, with a couple of officers stationed for passport stamping and various document-checking processes. They generally do not scan the passports handed to them by passengers. Their computers fully support every fancy security technology known to border control agents the world over. It is uncommon, as a light-skinned American or European passport holder, to even receive a single question when entering or exiting Iceland. After the passport is stamped, usually by request, passengers walk through a sliding glass door and into the second part of the customs checkpoint. This door is like a mantrap: it only opens when people approach it from one side. Once through, there is no turning back.

The second part of the checkpoint is another winding line that ends at a small podium. It is generally staffed by two women. The line splits in two thanks to the guidance of those little nylon barriers, familiar to anyone who has flown in the last decade. When a passenger reaches the podium, they pass their documents to whichever agent is free. The staff are quite pleasant, and they smile even when they notice a passenger that carries a mark of danger. It's the relaxed and calm Icelandic way; kind and friendly, with genuine warmth.

"You've been selected for security screening," the agent said to a passenger on the right side of the split. She handed the passenger a slip of paper marked with black text. The passenger was to follow the agent to an escalator, then escorted downstairs and out of sight. The passenger didn't question this process, and followed without comment. Three passengers in front of me passed the remaining agent without issue.

★ ★ ★

The system is not functional in the way that the security experts hoped it would be, and airports are often the worst in terms of pointless security theatrics. Millions of people the world over are constantly delayed, harassed and irradiated in the pursuit of some idea of security. Asking questions about the process is shut down by security agents, who claim they're just following orders. It is common to hear that secrecy is required for these processes, and that if one has to ask, one is not part of the privileged class that is welcome to an answer.

What would be fitting rewards for the people who design security checkpoints? The security industry has already received billions of dollars. Perhaps a Sisyphean reliving of their own work: but instead of pushing stones up hills, they must endure what millions of people now must undergo simply to move about the planet. After discussing this with other passengers, I often hear the joke that it wouldn't work unless they were also marked for extra special treatment. After discussing it with airline staff, they usually joke about a harsher punishment, but leave it unspecified.

Flight and detailed passenger information is sent to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for each passenger that flies to the U.S.; this happens even on a journey that has multiple stops in Europe. The Transportation Security Agency (TSA) is the arm of the DHS makes that makes these specific selections according to the agent who examined my boarding pass. The 'SSSS' marking on a boarding pass is part of a largely undisclosed process, with little transparency. "For security," you'll be told, if you ask. Whose security? The security of the people who can't design a transparent security system that passes a giggle test, that's who.

This culture of secrecy, endemic to most government security, is part of the reason that it's such an abysmal failure when faced with real security threats. For example, there's an interesting de-synchronization issue between the customs checkpoint and the top of the escalators. The guards at the podium are not trained as well as customs agents to spot false documents. Even if they were, they do not check against any real-time systems—handing them a different passport or simply a modified boarding pass would be a trivial task. An electronic document checking system wouldn't really change the fundamental problems with this kind of security processing.

★ ★ ★

With a forty-person line snaking behind me and only a single agent now checking documents, I felt guilty knowing other passengers were about to be delayed. I stepped forward. The agent warmly greeted me, then took my ticket and passport. She looked for the tell of how I was to be handled—is this person a dangerous terrorist? Is this person a security threat of some kind?

My security agent informed me of my unlucky pick of the random security straws, handed me the same half-sheet of paper, and instructed me that I should follow her. As I left, the man behind me—a friendly fellow American—asked what I'd done. I wanted to express my discomfort about his unfamiliarity with the process. I wanted to ask what he hadn't been doing. I felt like a jerk. It felt like blame-shifting.

Instead, I apologized for the delay and said nothing more. I already know it's not random. I already know that it is connected to a decade-long wave of authoritarianism—the same thing happened the last time I flew from Iceland to the United States and on many prior occasions. It happens to thousands of people every day—probably tens of thousands.

Unlike on one earlier occasion, however, I was not traveling with a member of Icelandic parliament. My only witnesses were strangers. I felt a pang of stress as we headed to the escalator; every passenger waited behind us, in the now-unattended line, for someone to return and to tell them they could cross an invisible barrier. It was my second time being detained in Iceland, and after more than a dozen detentions at the request of the U.S. government, I have to admit that I've been conditioned to take things in stride. Some people don't take to it as well. It's entirely understandable.

About halfway down the escalator, the agent apologised and let me know that I'd have to wait in the room until someone from the airline came to retrieve me. She also let me know that I wouldn't be allowed to shop, and another security check was now required. I knew this was going to happen and so had bought the new Bjork album, Biophilia, in anticipation of this entire security process. I highly endorse it—the new album, that is.

The two security agents, who were usually at the podium, crossed paths in opposite directions as we left. My escort let the other agent know that the line was waiting for her return. She smiled at me, then hurried up the escalator to the station.

Now, pretend for a moment that someone stuck in this process is actually a terrorist who wants to cause harm. How well is this system really going to work? It isn't going to work at all. The TSA responds to yesterday's threats today and then they tell other agencies what to do. Iceland is getting the short end of the stick here, and I'm just getting the stick.

After I confirmed my familiarity with their security process, my agent asked if I'd experienced this previously. I said that I was very acquainted with the process behind the glass doors ahead. She knocked on the door and an Icelandic man in his fifties greeted us.

After the glass door, there's a 2m-high wall not unlike a cubicle. Inside is where all of the security agents wait to search incoming passengers. A sign explains that this area is off-limits for photography. I inquired if I might photograph inside, but they said that it wasn't possible because of the rules. I also asked if I might write a review, and they said that would be fine, but only outside of the security screening area.

Two women stood behind a desk to the right. Four additional tables, two on the left and two against the far wall, took up most of the cube's remaining space. The right-most table held a machine where gloves and other objects are sampled for traces of chemicals such as as explosives. I've often wondered if these machines might also detect the cocaine rumored to be on a substantial amount of American money. I've experienced similar machines raise the alarm over black and white film in the past —always a joy.

I'm quite fond of Iceland. Even their security screening and detention areas are well done. The people running this secondary detention were hands down the friendliest of all security agents that I've ever encountered. I mean that. They're nice people, very calm, and not at all heavy-handed or rude. It's easy to see how the detainment here differs from one in Canada or the United States; perhaps the difference is that the only American in the process is the Suspected Terrorist.

Icelandic people have long memories, and this specially-locked and spacious room was filled with friendly and familiar faces. I placed my carry-on luggage on a flat metal table against the back wall and took off my overcoat. I was given a thorough, professional frisking. It's always awkward to talk about sensitive and private body piercings with a total stranger. The older agent frisking me understood my request that he not be too rough around my nipples. Luckily for me, I'd met most of these security agents previously and in a strange way, I felt like they weren't strangers at all. Is it possible to find oneself in a kind of Stockholm syndrome without constant exposure to your captors? Friendly faces and nothing to hide: what isn't to like about the process?

We discussed the TSA-approved locks on my bag; it was hilarious, in a frustrating sort of way. These locks, widely sold in stores and online, can be opened two different ways. There's a combination tumbler and a standardized lock, for which the TSA issues skeleton keys to security agents. Unfortunately, it turns our that while the TSA trusts foreign airports enough to rely on them to catch suspected terrorists, it does not trust them enough to provide them with these keys.

I asked the security agent if they had the key to the lock on my suitcase, and pointed out that I didn't. The agent was baffled by the idea of a lock whose owner did not have a key: Sir, isn't that your suitcase? Why yes, it is mine, but I don't travel with the keys, which means that security screeners have access to my belongings and I do not. The TSA, after all, reserves the right to search your luggage outside of your presence. If it were not for the approach to security embodied by the locks, I might suffer some property damage at the whim of some government agent when I'm not looking.

The Icelandic security agent explained that they just solve this problem by only searching luggage with the passenger present—no need for anything more complicated.

Thinking about the keys is a reminder to me of the futility and blindness encompassing the security process. I could fashion a set of keys from my very own lock should I be so inclined, as could anyone with some extra time or money. I find this even stranger than the all too obvious markings on my ticket. Does the TSA trust the Icelandic security process or not?

After that confusion was cleared up, my luggage was efficiently searched.

★ ★ ★

One might guess that the TSA thinks that this keeps the locks safer and limits problems caused by their poor security decisions. But that guess implies that the TSA thinks rationally about security. While there's no question that there are people involved who are rational, the institution is less than the sum of its parts. It is not a person, and as a body it is incapable of thinking in a cohesive manner. It is ruled by emotions rather than rationality. It offers little to no transparency and little to no accountability. It is a race to the bottom. But most of all, it is the embodiment of the deepest American fears about security failures.

That sting, as it is said by Tarantino, "is pride fucking with you." This is wrong and everyone knows it. Why do we persist with this nonsense? Why does America bully everyone else into following our flawed and stupid lead?

I don't believe that any meaningful statistics about this are published by the DHS. Only a few numbers are released to the press, through anonymous sources. The DHS certainly won't tell you about their tactics, though I'd be happy to tell you all about them. Their secrecy is not safe with me.

Certainly not after the number of times they've denied me a lawyer or a bathroom, or had to listen to inferences about prison rape suffered by people in my position. That class act is the face of our nation, as the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) wing of the DHS likes to say. Here, however, I was in another nation, and its face is quite different, even when executing the same useless gameplan.

★ ★ ★

I have to admit being happy to see another older gentleman I had spoken with during my last detainment in Iceland. He remembered me and we discussed how we'd met the last time. He asked how I'd been, and I was relieved to speak with him; he understood all too well the big picture behind what I was experiencing. Previously, he'd explained my situation to the aforementioned member of the Icelandic parliament. The layout of the detention room was explained to me again. He patted me on the back and was all smiles. I hope he gets a promotion.

After processing, one exits at the far left corner of the cube. There, a walkway guides travelers past twin bathrooms to the detention area—smooth sailing if a passenger makes it this far.

It is, hands down, the most welcoming detention area someone might visit, lacking any kind of nationalist propaganda. This is more than one can say about other airport detention facilities, such as Toronto Pearson's pre-clearance area. Operated by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on Canadian soil, it's covered in flags and giant eagles. Everyone has a firearm.

I've met just a single nice person in half a dozen detainments in that airport. Those guys are also just following orders, but man, what a bunch of jerks. The small detention area in Reykjavík, by comparison, is downright relaxing. There are free bottles of water in a fridge, and usually a plate or four of cookies, snacks and condiments. There's even a nice little espresso machine, with a button that might produce an alright café latté. I've never managed to get this machine to make anything more than black coffee, but I admit that I didn't want to trouble the staff.

Frankly, I find it rather frustrating to do much other than apologize to them for how my country, the United States of America, imposes its own security politics onto an otherwise reasonable country.

I usually feel pretty depressed by the time I've collected a coffee and found a seat. On the other hand, one might see the entire process as not unlike a first-class lounge. High-priority people with some kind of Very Important Person status get to wait here. If you're in the room, you're somebody.

One of the people I met in the waiting area rationalized our mutual detention just so. I asked what he was "in for" and he laughed. It's gallows humor, but without the condemned man's relief at knowing the answer, or any information about a possible answer. He expressed concern about missing his flight and hoped that they would come to collect us soon. It was his first time.

I tried to comfort him by explaining the familiar process, only to feel horrible for rationalizing our experience in the framework of everything being OK. We were doing what we were told, we would make our flight, and we'd be fine when it was all over.

If anything, however, the process is proof of the opposite. Though we'd manage to leave the room, we could not leave the system that produced that room. In fact, the system that put us here wasn't in the process of ending at all. Quite the opposite—after boarding the plane, we'd fly towards at least two more checkpoints, more bag searches, more paperwork, and perhaps more frisking. We were headed straight into a modern surveillance state and were lucky to be getting free cookies at the halfway mark.

The friendly Icelandic security agent walked in my field of view. I asked him how his day was going, and invited him for a coffee. He declined the coffee but sat down between the two of us. Half a dozen other people, and a small child, were in the room. Each person passed the time in their own way. The agent and I had a brief chat. He asked how my Icelandic friends were, and if everything was alright with me. The angst-afflicted guy, sat closest to us, seemed dismayed at our conversation. I thanked the agent and he patted me on the back. Part of me feels entirely crushed by the kindness of people who are trapped in a machine that forces them to follow orders, even when they know better than the process. How could anyone be upset with them? They have a job, it's just part of their job, and they're doing the best that they possibly might hope to do. Part of me feels some hope that at least this process still has humans who think and feel—people who empathize and who are not overcome by the culture of fear.

When the Iceland Air representative came for us, the "first class" service continued. He called out for Seattle-bound passengers. We lined up in silence. The security agents lined the path to the door like a gauntlet, and as I exited the older gentleman reached out to shake my hand. I awkwardly fumbled my coffee and my bag around to free up a hand. He wished me good luck on my trip and with my life.

Holding up the line again, I thought.

Our little line made our way to the gate, escorted by security. At the ticket counter before the entrance to the jetway, we each handed over our boarding passes and passports. As expected, a small alarm on the computer rang out and I stole a glance at the screen. I'm not the fastest reader but I noticed that it said my name and that there was a "high priority comment" waiting for the gate agent. I asked what the comment was and if it was any trouble at all. Having never met these agents in the past, they were quite skeptical of speaking with me. The shame of the 'SSSS' marking reared its head again. They said that it was merely a way for them to know that I was already boarded; it was as if they had scanned my boarding pass a second time by mistake, the gate agent explained. As usual I was not informed about the reasons for any of this special treatment and as usual, I was not given an opportunity to correct information about myself in the system that controls my movements.

It doesn't feel good to watch someone make up utter nonsense on a whim, and yet that was the system's final manifestion. I was handed my boarding pass and passport and instructed to board the airplane.

I settled in and filled out my customs form, noting everything I'd purchased and reporting on my private life as the forms demand: where I'd been, where I would be staying, how much money I'd spent, why I had been traveling, and other questions that are no-one's business but my own. If I failed to do this perfectly, I'd be bothered more on a technicality. It is absolutely ridiculous.

My entire flight "home" was filled with stressful and negative thoughts. I wonder if I'll ever be able to land in my own country without a sense of anxiety. Will I ever have closure or clarification on more than a year of extended harassment, detainments, threats and even property seizure?

★ ★ ★

People often say to me "well, don't you know why this is happening to you?" and I reply that while we may all speculate, I have been refused official answers. The little official correspondence I received said it was probably a mistake. It took months and they assure me that things will be better someday, probably. I've been detained multiple times since that letter, both in the U.S. and abroad. The DHS won't share a copy of my files with me or my lawyers. It says that I have no right to know what is in them.

The redress letter suggests that even though nothing is wrong, I'll still be selected for "random" screenings. Consider what they tell us of safety and justice, and ask yourself: is it possible that a system full of such obvious and casual dishonesty will provide it?

Jacob Appelbaum is an independent computer security researcher and hacker. He is currently employed by the University of Washington, and is a core member of the Tor project. After working as a volunteer with WikiLeaks, he has been detained at airports more than a dozen times.

Photos: Jacob Appelbaum
Background image: Pixelab.be
Polaroid frames: Sanami276
Layout: Rob Beschizza

Previously:

Wikileaks volunteer detained
Wikileaks volunteer detained and searched again by US agents
Wikileaks volunteer detained and searched yet again at airport
Secret US Court Order demands email data for WikiLeaks volunteer Jacob Appelbaum
Wikileaks: Q&A with Jacob Appelbaum on "The Afghan War Diaries"



October 31, 10:17 AM

Today is the day that the population of the earth was expected to reach seven billion people. By the year 2045, we may have nine billion! How is the earth going to handle so many? To mark the occasion, the Neatorama Spotlight Blog looks at National Geographic’s year-long series on world population. The images are from National Geographic magazine’s new “7 Billion” app, based on its year-long series on world population, now available as a free app for iPad. Link

(Image credit: ©John Stanmeyer/National Geographic)

October 29, 04:57 PM


A flier circulating within the Occupy movement gives detailed instructions for defending yourself against tear-gas attacks, noting that it is "only for defense purposes" and warning "never incite violence."

Flier to OWS Protesters: "Defending Against Tear Gas" (via Beth Pratt)

October 27, 01:00 PM
Do you know where you fit in chronologically with the seven billion or so human folk running around sweet Terra? BBC has a really cool tool that lets you plug in your birthday to get an approximation of which number human you were to sprout up on the planet. More »


October 26, 01:16 PM

Gaius, a self-described member of the 1% ("Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan would save me roughly $400,000 a year in taxes, and President Obama's tax proposals would cost me more than $100,000") writes on DailyKos in support of the Occupy movement and describes the absurdity of the pitched battles over raising taxes on the rich by a mere 3.5%:

Thus you can imagine my amazement this summer when I watched the Republicans in Congress push the United States to the brink of default - and the world to the brink of ruin - over whether to repeal a portion of the Bush tax cuts and raise my taxes by 3.5%. I know a lot of people with high incomes and even the conservatives among them were confused by that sequence of events. Here is a secret about rich people: we wouldn't have noticed a 3.5% tax increase. That is not only because there isn't a material difference between having $1 million and $965,000, which is obvious, but also because most of us don't actually know how much money we are going to make in a given year. Most income at that level is the result of profits rather than salary, whether it comes in the form of bonuses, stock options, partnership distributions, dividends or capital gains. Profits are unpredictable and they tend to vary wildly. At my own firm, the general rule of thumb is that if we are within 5% of our budget for the year, everyone is happy and no one complains. A variation of 3.5% is merely a random blip.

I was not amazed but disgusted when John Boehner and his crew tried to justify the extremity of their position by rebranding the wealthy as "job creators." While true in a very basic sense, it obscures the fact that jobs are a cost that is voluntarily incurred only as a result of demand. Hiring has no correlation at all to profits or to income - none. Let me keep more of my money without increasing customer demand and I will do just that - keep it. Perhaps I will spend a little more of it, though probably not, but even if I do it won't help the economy very much. Here is another secret of the well-to-do: we don't really buy much more stuff than everyone else. It may be more expensive stuff, sure, but I don't buy cars, or appliances, or furniture, or anything else more frequently than the average consumer. The things I do spend more money on are services such as travel, entertainment, restaurants and landscaping, none of which generate well-paying middle class jobs. There, in a nutshell, is the sad explanation of what has happened to the American economy over the last 25 years of "trickle down" economics.

A Voice From the 1% (via Beth Pratt)

October 26, 09:30 AM
Got a lot of books crowding your home or feel buried under paper clutter, without the time or the equipment to scan everything? 1DollarScan is a service that will digitize it all for you starting at just $1. More »


October 25, 06:14 PM


Julie188 writes "Windows XP – the XP stood for 'Experience' — was released October 25, 2001. With Windows XP, Microsoft hoped to have one codebase that would span everything from consumers to corporate desktops. Microsoft was fairly ambitious with XP. There was an embedded version that went everywhere, from phones to information kiosks. Banks in particular embraced it as a way to migrate off IBM's dead-end-but-once-great OS/2. Consumers have been quicker to ditch XP for Windows 7 while businesses hem and haw and slowly test a decade's-worth of custom apps on Windows 7. Some estimates show that XP still has a hold on 48% of the Windows market."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

October 25, 10:00 PM
You may have heard rumblings and grumblings about a Senate bill that would "effectively destroy" YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, Google+, and any other service that lets people post things on the internet. More »


October 26, 01:00 AM
Whether you're sliding a bar or pulling a puzzle piece across your smartphone screen, you're performing an action patented by Apple. Seriously, any "predefined gesture" used to unlock a phone is now covered under patent 8,046,721, issued today. Check out the full—albeit indecipherable—patent description at The Register. More »


October 24, 04:26 PM

Daily deals site Groupon is launching its IPO roadshow this week and is seeking a $10 billion valuation for the company, less than half of what was rumored when the company first filed to go public in June. That’s a big haircut.

With the recent turmoil in the markets, it’s a terrible time to bring a new offering to market. But Groupon may have no choice: based on the numbers we’ve seen from the company to date, it’s burning through cash and may have to go public in order keep the lights on.

According to the company’s latest S-1 filing, its merchant liabilities have increased 19% from $392 to $467 million in the last quarter. Its current liabilities exceed its current assets by more than $300 million.

Groupon uses money from new deals to pay off merchants from previous deals, so Groupon’s continued existence is dependent on consumers and merchants having confidence in Groupon’s continued existence.

In recent weeks, Groupon has experienced a barrage of negative publicity from a wide range of media outlets, including The New York Times. Neither Reuters nor The Associated Press had a positive quote from analysts in their coverage of the company.

If consumers believe that Groupon deals might not be honored and stop buying them, the company will be starved for cash and will collapse.

If merchants believe that they might not be paid for Groupons that they issue and stop running Groupons, the company will be starved for cash and will collapse.

If markets were perfectly efficient, Groupon would collapse overnight like Lehman Brothers.

Groupon bears a lot of similarity to the subprime mortgage crisis:

  • No one knows how much value is out there in outstanding Groupons. No one has kept track. Groupon is working to improve this, but many Groupons are still tracked by pen and paper or not tracked at all.
  • Groupon issues big checks to merchants without any credit check or due diligence. Groupon is taking on a lot of risk of merchants not honoring their obligations. See my earlier VentureBeat story on the challenges that relying on small businesses poses for Groupon.
  • It’s impossible to tell with certainty who will owe money to whom if Groupon fails.
  • Banks don’t fully understand the risk they are taking on.
  • Groupon merchants don’t fully understand the service that they are buying. Groupon is pitched to merchants as a “no risk” way of reaching consumers. There may be no money down, but running a Groupon has a lot of long-term risk, including losing money on poorly targeted customers and damaging your Yelp ratings.
  • Much like housing market models that relied on housing prices to continue to grow, Groupon’s model relies on continued revenue growth. With the latest S-1, we saw that once Groupon slows investment in marketing, revenue growth slows down substantially.

Here’s my best analysis of who stands to lose if Groupon collapses:

Consumers. Groupon purchasers could lose between $500 million and $1 billion. This depends on two major factors: the extent to which merchants choose to honor Groupons and the ability to dispute charges with credit card companies.

Recommendation: Consumers should only purchase Groupons they can use within 60 days. Avoid Groupons for big ticket purchases (like travel) far into the future.

Small businesses. Merchants who sell products and services through Groupon stand to lose up to $500 million. In the United States and Canada, merchants are typically paid within 60 days of the date the Groupon runs. In the rest of the world, merchants are typically paid after the Groupon is redeemed. The big question is what merchants choose to do in the case of a Groupon failure. Do they continue to honor Groupons that were issued? Or do they tell consumers, “Sorry, not our problem?” Continuing to honor Groupons would be the right customer service move but bad for profits. This will vary by merchant.

Recommendation: While I’ve long advised most categories of small businesses to avoid running Groupons just based on the terrible economics, I believe businesses should consider Groupon credit risk. If the cash from running Groupons is critical to your business, I would recommend against running them.

Credit card companies. These are potential losers that may surprise a lot of people. Companies such as Chase Paymentech and American Express could also lose hundreds of millions. The companies essentially serve as a backstop for consumers.

According to Visa’s Ted Carr, for 60 days after the statement on which a charge appears, “Visa operating regulations provide card issuers and cardholders with protection when a merchant ceases operations and the cardholder does not receive what was paid for (the merchant’s bank/acquirer is liable.)”

American Express’s Marina Hoffmann Norville said it’s possible that consumers would be able to dispute charges for longer than 60 days. “We will determine on a case-by-case basis how we will address disputes in those instances where a merchant goes bankrupt or abruptly ceases operation,” she said.

Other credit card issuers like Citi and Bank of America may also lose if they choose to issue refunds in the name of good customer service and can’t recover the money from Groupon’s merchant bank.

With new products like Groupon Getaways, this risk gets even bigger. Instead of a $40 transaction, many transactions are in the hundreds of dollars.

The risk is magnified by the fact that there are often no clear records of Groupon redemptions. Unscrupulous consumers may seek refunds even after they’ve used a Groupon.

Recommendation: Credit card companies are in a tough spot. They can increase the holdback that they have for Groupon. This means that they would hold back more money to cover potential losses. But this would hurt Groupon’s cash flow; that in itself could cause Groupon to collapse. Frontier Airlines was forced into bankruptcy when its credit card processor, First Data, decided to hold back more of the proceeds from ticket sales.

Business partners. Groupon spends hundreds of millions on advertising, much of it on the Internet. Ad networks and publishers stand to lose any unpaid money.

Recommendation: Companies who are heavily dependent on Groupon advertising revenue should look closely at the risk exposure that they have and consider whether the payment terms they give to Groupon are appropriate. This is especially true for ad networks that pay out to publishers in advance of receiving payment.

City of Chicago. Chicago has built its tech reputation on Groupon’s meteoric rise. In many ways, this has been undeserved because Groupon is fundamentally a sales and marketing company, not a technology company. (Fewer than 5% of Groupon’s employees are in technology; many of those are based in Palo Alto.) Some Chicagoans are worried about the impact a Groupon collapse will have on the psyche and reputation of the city.

Rick Summer, a senior equity analyst for Morningstar, a Chicago-based investment research firm, says, “I’m pretty neutral on Groupon’s importance to the city. But I take the longer-term prudent view of’ ‘freeing up good people to run better business.’”

Employees. Groupon employs more than 10,000 people. They stand to lose their jobs and any unpaid wages.

Investors. Of course, public and private investors stand to lose their entire investment. Summer’s analysis values Groupon at $5 billion, less than half the value that the company is seeking. That’s also less than the reported $6 billion that Google offered for Groupon. In Morningstar’s research report, he writes, “IPO investors face a nontrivial risk of permanent capital impairment.” That’s a fancy way of saying IPO investors stand to lose their shirts.

I contacted Groupon to give the company the opportunity to respond to my assertions here, but it has declined to comment (SEC regulations typically prevent pre-IPO companies from making public statements).

My points here are not idle speculation. I believe that without significant business model changes, Groupon could cease to exist in the next 12 to 24 months. The company’s recent product announcements seem to be rehashes of long-established online commerce plays (travel, liquidation of unwanted goods) or products that will have little short-term impact (Groupon Now).

A successful IPO will alleviate some of these issues in that it will give the company more of a cash cushion. But the increased scrutiny that comes with being a public company will bring even more attention to every move the company makes. If that news continues to be negative, it will weaken confidence in Groupon.

This same analysis (except my reference to the City of Chicago, of course) applies to all of the companies in the group buying space, with the exception of Google. (Google’s sizable cash horde makes credit risk and consumer confidence non-issues.)

Last week, we saw BuyWithMe, another group buying company, lay off more than half of its staff after it failed to secure more financing. BuyWithMe didn’t have nearly the scale that Groupon does, but what happens to it could be a good indicator of what will happen with Groupon.

Rocky Agrawal is an analyst focused on the intersection of local, social and mobile. He is a principal analyst at reDesign mobile. Previously, he launched local and mobile products for Microsoft and AOL. He blogs at http://blog.agrawals.org and tweets at @rakeshlobster.


Filed under: deals, VentureBeat

October 24, 09:31 PM

It’s become the most common form of communication on the planet and the number one occupation of teenagers everywhere.  That’s right, I’m talking about text messaging (SMS) which, quite often, is the best way to send someone a short message without getting trapped talking on the phone for ages.  Whether it’s keeping in touch with friends and relatives in other countries or texting your partner to request a takeaway, it’s hard to find someone these days who doesn’t know what texting is or who has never done it before.

Our infographic today comes courtesy of MBA Online.  Find out the total number of texters in comparison to the world population or the number of Facebook users.  Find out the influence mobile phones have on their users and how text messaging has been used for good causes in different countries.

Are you an obsessed texter?  If so, how many do you send per day/week/month?  Would you rather text than talk to someone?  And do you know of any good causes that texting has been used for?  Let us know in the comments!  If you are on the opposite side of the argument and you HATE texting, then don’t hesitate to tell us why in the comments too!

As usual, just click on the infographic below to see a bigger version.

Created by: MBA Online
Image Credit : Adam & Lucy

October 24, 10:00 AM
When I was an IT admin, I had the pleasure of dealing often with people who would submit urgent service requests and then leave for the day, leaving their office empty and computer locked by the time I could get there to help. Fortunately, I was often able to fix their problem while they weren't there. Why? Their password was somewhere on their desk in one of these easy-to-find locations. More »


October 24, 05:02 PM

New submitter arcite writes "It's official: planet Earth is now home to over seven billion ugly-bags-of-mostly-water (otherwise known as humans). We're adding ten thousand new humans every hour, or one billion every nine years. Head over to 7 Billion Actions (put together by the UN with the help of SAP) and check out the population map data. Short of adopting a strict diet of Soylent Green, what viable solutions will enable us to survive on this increasingly crowded pale blue dot? What will the role of technology be in supporting this many people?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

October 24, 01:55 PM

Please marvel at Wired's great slideshow history of the spacesuit.

October 20, 01:12 PM

I ran across and interesting quote by Albert Einstein the other day.

Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.
~ Albert Einstein

This isn’t exactly the best known quote by Einstein and I doubt many teachers quote this to their students. Reading is generally a good thing, but if it starts becoming a substitute for thinking on your own it can hold you back from reaching your potential.

This quote touches on a problem that holds many people back from actually accomplishing things. It is easy to spend so much time researching that you never actually execute.  That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t read, do research and try to learn from others, but at some point you have to decide that you’ve gathered enough data and the time has come to do something. That may be starting your own business, writing a book or even repainting your living room.  You have a very finite lifespan. Some people spend their life preparing for what they want to do without ever actually doing what they want to do.

Sometimes the most helpful situations are the ones that force you to go ahead and do something by removing the option to try to collect more information.

Business minded? Subscribe to Mark Shead’s business consulting blog.

This article was useful when looking for:
  • reading too much (39)
  • too much reading (13)
  • read too much (10)
  • how much reading is too much (7)
  • i read too much (6)
  • albert einstein (4)
  • einstein (4)
  • scientific name for reading too much (3)

---
Related Articles at Productivity501:


October 23, 03:49 PM

theodp writes "Over at the Google Web Search Community, posters are questioning why Google feels free to IFrame others' web pages, yet blocks attempts to IFrame pages on its own sites. 'Google has so much contradiction in what it wants for itself and what it does with other websites [e.g., Google frames Slashdot],' quipped one poster. 'Do no evil, right?' And over at the Google Maps Help Forum, developers are also begging for Google to allow them to IFrame entire pages again. 'I know there are other options (&embed etc.),' explains a poster, 'but then there is no sidebar which is useless. I really need the functionality like it was before.' Can any Googlers out there explain The Mystery of 'This content cannot be displayed in a frame'?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

October 23, 04:53 PM


harrymcc writes "It's been exactly ten years since Steve Jobs stood on a stage at Apple and explained to a surprisingly small group of journalists that his company was going to make a music player and call it iPod. Technologizer's Benj Edwards celebrated the iPod's first decade by rounding up a dozen iPod-related oddities, including the iPod-powered tooth cleaner, an iPod mount for a semi-automatic sniper system, and the classic 1958 Dieter Rams Braun FM radio that may have helped inspire it all."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Posts

Generations.

Derek Bernard was right afterall. Americans really love their balls.

Another day at 417SCRG.

Mouthwatering homemade lunch: Indonesian nasi hainam.

Reminiscing the hardwork of yore: interface design of my final project.

Somewhere else,a network administrator’s sanity hangs precariously.

These two brothers costed me an arm and a leg.

It’s been more than a year and nothing has been done to the busway shelter.

If all twelve of the busways are operational and supported by the commuter trains, Jakarta wouldn’t be a city with toxic, crippling traffic.

His first ride ever in that thing.

Audio

Updates

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz